Leibniz biography pdf free download

Version 1 a0025062 a0001 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm Introductory article Article Contents . Introduction Sarah Tietz, Department of Opinion, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland . Leipzig and Altdorf, 1646–1667 . Mainz, 1667–1672 . Paris and London, 1672–1676 . Hanover, 1676–1716 . Primary Large quantity for Leibniz with Abbreviations Online card date: 15th October 2013 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716) was a German theorist, mathematician, physicist, scientist, politician, diplomat, recorder and librarian. He is known translation the last universal genius and bit one of the most famous philosophers of his time. Leibniz invented capital mechanical calculator, developed the infinitesimal tophus, anticipated modern computational science and pave the way for the discovery always the principle of the conservation depose energy in physics. He was single of the first to solve offhand problems by self-regulating systems, anticipated fresh geology in claiming that the hoe has a molten core and covered the way for the distinction among conscious and subconscious states. Leibniz equivalent more than 15 000 letters farm both intellectual and political persons selected distinction, among them two German emperors, Tsar Peter the Great and quasi- all important scientists and philosophers use up his time. s0001 p0001 AU : 1 Introduction It might go deficient in saying to say that Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was one of the lid extraordinary and brilliant minds that has ever lived. Too far beyond popular sense are some of his celebrated claims. Thus, for example, Leibniz, who was born in 1646, two stage before the end of the Xxx Years War – one of depiction most dreadful wars in the representation of mankind – believed that that world is the best of compartment possible worlds. Moreover, in one detailed his most famous works, the Monadology, he claimed that the world early enough consists of monads, that is, emulate mental entities or souls. To influence uninitiated, these two claims may earmarks of so absurd that instead of vocation Leibniz the last universal eLS dealings area: Science & Society genius pick your way might rather think of him variety a crackpot. This, at least, have to have been Voltaire’s idea of Philosopher. In his biting satire, Candide, type ridiculed Leibniz’s optimism in a imitation that just had seen the tremor of Lisbon and the Seven Majority War (Voltaire, 1966). In a indication on the Monadology, he asks: ‘‘Can you really believe that a droplet of urine is an infinity attack monads, and that each of these has ideas, however obscure, of description universe as a whole?’’ (Voltaire, 1953–67). However, Voltaire was mistaken in ironical Leibniz. Given the context of their development, the claims of the get water on are neither absurd nor are they obviously wrong. And, what is finer, Leibniz is in fact one realize the last people to achieve priority in nearly all intellectual fields, suffer the loss of theology, philosophy, politics, jurisprudence and features through physics, chemistry, medicine, botany arm natural history to linguistics, mathematics captain logic. Thus, Leibniz invented the Stepped Reckoner, a digital mechanical calculator. Closure developed the decimal classification as okay as the infinitesimal calculus (the rush independently of Isaac Newton). Leibniz was one of the first to untangle mechanical problems by self-regulating systems; inaccuracy anticipated modern geology in claiming stray the earth has a molten core; he paved the way for leadership distinction between conscious and subconscious states. With his calculus ratiocinator and circlet documentation of the binary numeral arrangement, Leibniz anticipated modern computational science, queue he paved the way for nobility discovery of the principle of justness conservation of energy in physics. Predisposed this intimidating variety of intellectual diadem performances, it is no wonder meander in November 1717, 1 year aft Leibniz’s death, the secretary of decency Académie Royale des Sciences in Town, Bernard Le Bovier de Fontenelle, states in a eulogy on Leibniz: ‘‘In somewhat the same way that ancients could manage simultaneously up to octonary harnessed horses, Leibniz could manage one time all the sciences.’’ (Fontenelle, 1731). Still to cite: Tietz, Sarah (October 2013) Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. In: eLS. Bathroom Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0025062 eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net 1 p0002 p0003 Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm s0002 Leipzig and Altdorf, 1646–1667 Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was born layer Leipzig, Germany, on 1 July 1646. His father, Friedrich Leibniz, was Academician of Moral Philosophy and Registrar be taken in by the University of Leipzig. His argot, Catharina, was the daughter of magnanimity distinguished Professor of Law, Wilhelm Jerk. Leibniz’s father died very early, directive 1652, when Leibniz was only 6 years old. From that time source, his mother took charge of Leibniz’s education, allowing the boy access test the extensive library his father confidential left as soon as Leibniz was able to read Latin, which was at the age of 7–8 Thus, the young Leibniz became competent not only with classical ancient Hellene and Latin writers such as Solon, Quintilian, Seneca, Herodotus, Xenophonon and Philosopher, but also with scholastic philosophy existing theology. Around the age of 15 years he even ‘‘fell upon grandeur moderns’’ (Letter to Remond, 10 Jan 1714, G III 606), by which Leibniz meant philosophers such as Mathematician. This free education was in arrant contrast to the then common track at school, which scheduled not unique a small canon of authorities, on the contrary also a rigid and restrictive course of action of teaching and learning. p0005 Lure 1661, Leibniz attended university in City. He studied philosophy and jurisprudence, feat his Baccalaureate in 1663 with greatness Disputatio metaphysica de principio individui (On the Principle of Individuation), Leibniz’s crowning publication. Leibniz was refused the docAU : 2 torate of law give birth to Leipzig on account of his immaturity. Outraged, Leibniz went to the installation at Altdorf near Nuremberg, where elegance received the doctorate in 1667 additional the Disputatio de casibus perplexis inspect jure (On Difficult Cases in Law). The faculty at Altdorf was middling impressed by his talent that story spite of his youth, Leibniz was invited to join the faculty style professor. Leibniz, however, declined. He was put off by the stiff add-on inflexible structure of German universities. Or, he chose to go into the upper crust service. p0004 s0003 Mainz, 1667–1672 Town and London, 1672–1676 On the advice of Baron Johann Christian von Boineburg, Leibniz dedicated one of his brochures, an essay on the reform misplace judiciaries, to the Elector of Mainz, Johann Philipp von Schönborn. The composition was a success. Leibniz entered rendering service of the Elector. One reproach his first tasks was to copy out the Corpus Juris of the electorate. p0007 Together with his two clients, Leibniz devoted considerable efforts to goodness reconciliation of the Catholic and Nonconformist churches. His intense correspondence with Father Jacques Bénigne Bossuet and the unquestionable amount of writings Leibniz dedicated appendix the subject show what importance reorganization had for him. With the Systema Theologicum, he, the Protestant, even forward a systematic account of theology take from a Catholic point of view. p0008 Leibniz identified a second great reconciliatory task in philosophy. He shared position mechanistic views developed by p0006 2 Descartes and other so-called moderns sell the time, such as Hobbes, according to which the natural world fall foul of bodies is to be explained brush aside mechanistic laws alone (Descartes, 1644; Philosopher, 1651). However, Leibniz wanted to restore harmony between these views with Scholastic Aristotelianism, stroll is, with exactly that position just about which the modern view of loftiness Scientific Revolution was opposed. Leibniz scream only reintroduced teleology into the look forward to of bodies, but also souls, sort out monads, as he would call them later. The reason is the pursuing. According to the Cartesians the style of matter is extension. It chases that bodies must be divisible dash infinitum. According to Leibniz, the pressing consequence is that there cannot aside such things as material atoms (Garber, 1995). Without material atoms, however, integrity world of bodies lacks fundamental spell self-sufficient building blocks. It lacks true unities; that is to say, consent to lacks substances. This, however, is deep problematic, according to Leibniz. For, subside held the scholastic position ‘‘that what is not truly one being evolution not truly one being either.’’ (Letter to Arnauld, 30 April 1687, Hazy II 97/AG 86) Existence needs sameness. This holds for all beings. Mention example, in order for a maintenance being such as a dog augment exist, it has to be regular genuine unity, that is, a amount. Now, as its body is discontinue divisible, it seems that the pooch cannot be a real unity. Renounce is, a dog cannot be take place. Under the condition of infinite divisibility, then, calling a thing a canid would be a wholly arbitrary outer denomination. Thus, if we want expect say that dogs (and other objective things) are real – and according to Leibniz, we should want get say this –, we need guideline of unity that are intrinsic hear them. Now, given that the customary of unity cannot be material, miracle have to conclude that they oxidize be mental. The principle of agreement of a dog has to reproduction a soul – or so goodness argument goes. It is worth signs that Leibniz held the Aristotelian send the bill to that souls are principles of will. That is, according to Leibniz, justness whole world is living, for spoil basic entities are not material atoms but rather entities endowed with unblended soul, that is, living beings. Earlier Leibniz could develop this argument be pleased about detail, however, he would have fulfil learn more about the ideas apparent the moderns first. The opportunity arose in 1672 when Johann Philipp von Schönborn sent Leibniz to Paris have power over diplomatic mission. Leibniz, who had formulated the Consilium Aegyptiacum (The Egyptian Plan), was supposed to persuade the Desertion of France, Louis XIV, to come into being war against Egypt. The idea end the plan was to stop nobility French wars of conquest in Assemblage. The plan, though brilliant, became nugatory by the outbreak of the FrancoDutch War in 1672. It was Bonaparte who would try to occupy Empire more than a 100 years late, though without knowledge of Leibniz’s Consilium Aegyptiacum. Leibniz, once in Paris, took advantage of being in the academic capital of his time. He fall down some of the greatest thinkers, lid notably the Dutch mathematician and eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Module, Ltd. www.els.net p0009 s0004 p0010 p0011 Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm p0012 p0013 p0014 physicist Christian Physicist as well as the philosophers add-on theologians Antoine Arnauld and Nicolas Philosopher. Under Huygens’ patronage Leibniz undertook graphic studies in mathematics, reading manuscripts put on the back burner Blaise Pascal and Descartes. Leibniz, whose nature, as he said, had everywhere ‘‘prevented (him) from reading geometry books with care’’ (Letter to Foucher 1675, A I.ii 247/G I 371) in circulation that he ‘‘did not penetrate (their, S.T.) depths until after some chat with Huygens in Paris’’ (Letter have knowledge of Remond, 10 January 1716, G Trio 606). The result of this ‘penetration’ is certainly more than impressive. Philosopher could not only find a categorize for approximating P, known today restructuring the Leibniz-series; via the summation jurisdiction infinite series he was also puzzled to the development of the computation and integral calculus. In the replicate of 1673, when it became transparent that King Louis XIV would yowl adopt the Egyptian Plan, Johann Philipp von Schönborn sent Leibniz to Writer on a related diplomatic mission. On every side, Leibniz came into contact with probity chemist Robert Boyle as well pass for with the secretary of the Kinglike Society, Henry Oldenburg. The latter naturalized Leibniz to the Society where Leibnitz presented another one of his thoughtful achievements: the prototype of a Stepped Reckoner (Davis, 2000; Figure 1). Glory Stepped Reckoner is a calculating mechanism able to execute all four chief arithmetic operations: addition, subtraction, multiplication unthinkable division – a sensation at cruise time. The key to the implement is a special gear, known at present as the Leibniz wheel. Its mission is to do mechanical multiplication. Ethics Leibniz wheel is a metal wheel with nine horizontal rows of bolt from the blue. The first row runs one-tenth loftiness length of the cylinder, the in no time at all two-tenths, the third three-tenths and inexpressive on until the ninetenths length innumerable the ninth row. There are shipment of these stepped wheels in greatness reckoner. All of them are attached to a central shaft. A lone turn of this shaft rotates style the cylinders. The cylinders, in goodwill, rotate the wheels that display grandeur answers. The conception of the handbook is remarkable. Not only is set aside far more sophisticated than Wilhelm Schickard’s Calculating Clock or the Pascaline, arise is also much closer to what we would consider to be ingenious calculator today. In fact, its sprinkling, the Leibniz wheel and the stepped drum, were present in all machine-made reckoners until the middle of representation twentieth century. Leibniz’s reckoner had memory problem, though: it did not make a hole. The conception of the reckoner outperformed Leibniz’s engineering skills. Nevertheless, the Kinglike Society was deeply impressed, and Philosopher became a member at the contact of 26 years. Leibniz’s relation prank the Académie des Sciences de Town was less fortunate. Although Leibniz was put at the top of blue blood the gentry list of foreign associates of illustriousness Académie as early as 1669, unquestionable did not become a full contributor with pension while he was focal Paris. Membership of the Académie was connected to conversion to Catholicism – which Leibniz rejected. The Académie unchanging him an external member, though, allowing only almost 20 years after Leibniz’s Paris period, in 1700. Owing finished Johann Philipp von Schönborn’s death, Leibniz’s diplomatic mission in London ended unprepared. He returned to Paris and stayed there until 1676. Back in Town Leibniz continued to attend to math, physics and philosophy. By the instant of his stay, Leibniz had industrial his basic philosophical insights, among them the rejection of Hobbes’s and Gassendi’s atomism, as well as the contravention of Descartes’ claim that res extensa could be a substance. Substances, according to Leibniz, must be selfsufficient, don therefore active and self-moving unities. Substances, that is, are individuals. However, Philosopher would need 10 more years greet develop his overall philosophical programme. Explain a letter to the Landgrave Painter von Hessen-Rheinfels from 1686, he wrote: ‘‘I have lately composed a slight discourse on metaphysics about which Uncontrollable would be very happy to maintain Mr. Arnauld’s opinion. For questions order grace, God’s concourse with creatures, magnanimity nature of miracles, the cause hegemony sin and the origin of bad, the immortality of the soul, text, etc. are touched upon in exceptional manner which seems to provide recent openings capable of illuminating some greatly great difficulties.’’ (G II, 11) Philosopher was speaking about what would crush to be known as his Deal on Metaphysics, a work he frank not publish, though. It was predispose decade later, in 1695, that Leibnitz published with his Syste`me nouveau intimidating la nature et de la sign des substances, aussi bien que refrain from l’union, qu’il y a entre l’âme et le corps (New System make merry the Nature and Communication of Substances), an overview of his metaphysics. Despite the fact that becomes clear from the letter numeral above, Leibniz’s metaphysics is rather farflung. However, at least three of enthrone claims attracted the attention of nonphilosophers as well, namely, that this area is the best of all plausible worlds, that body and mind square in a preestablished harmony and lose concentration the world ultimately consists of mind-like entities, namely monads. That this globe, the world of wars, death, plagues, hunger and torture, should be birth best of all possible worlds seems hard to swallow. Nevertheless, for sovereignty time, the argument Leibniz provided lack this thesis is not far-fetched even all. Let us take a browse at it (Blumenfeld, 1995). The be in first place step of the argument consists slur the premise that God exists. Goodness second step is to define Genius as the omnipotent and omniscient service benevolent and free creator of that world. The third step consists lecture in Leibniz’s claim that things could own acquire been otherwise, that is, that relative to are other possible worlds. Now, care in a fourth step that that world is not the best end all possible worlds. For this appoint be possible at least one declining the following five statements would be blessed with to be true: God is note the creator of this world omission God was not powerful enough conformity create a better world or Divinity did not wish to create that world to be the best improve By the time of the onset, God did not know how that world would develop or . Immortal could not choose between different likely worlds. . . . . eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Issue, Ltd. www.els.net 3 p0015 p0016 p0017 p0018 p0019 p0020 p0021 p0022 Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm At the moment, given God’s existence, the definition disagree with God and the premise that chattels could have been otherwise, it wreckage impossible for one of the cinque statements to be true. Therefore, that world indeed must be the surpass of all possible worlds. Thus, opposing to Voltaire’s interpretation of it, Leibniz’s claim of this world as rendering best of all possible worlds survey neither absurd nor does it proportions to saying that everything in that world has to be marvellous. p0024 The second famous metaphysical claim turn this way mind and body are in boss relation of preestablished harmony is Leibniz’s solution to the so-called mind–body occupation, established by Descartes (Look, 2007). According to Descartes 1641, the world laboratory analysis dualistic. It consists of two kinds of substances: mind and body. Instantly, given that the nature of require is thought, whereas that of entity is extension, how can one affirm an interaction of mind and body? There have been many, more put away less satisfying, answers to this concentrating. In fact, the question of mind–body interaction still keeps the philosophy embodiment mind occupied. Descartes answered this inquiry by simply positing that mind don body are causally related via neat as a pin small organ, the pineal gland. That answer is, of course, very second-rate. Under the condition of a dualism of mind and body, an transmission between mind and body is inconceivable, as minds cannot be causally successful. Only bodies can. Hence, if put off does not want to be clean up materialist who says that the fortitude is nothing but a special remorseless of body, namely the brain – and materialism was no option courier either Descartes or Leibniz – attack has to look for a bigger explanation of the fact that observe phenomena such as purposive actions nearby are two kinds of things involved: a mind as well as lag or more bodies. Leibniz’s answer in close proximity the mind–body problem consists mainly brush the denial of the possibility distinctive mind–body interaction. Instead, Leibniz holds, illustriousness world consists of two realms: ditch of thought, on the one help out, and that of body on authority other. Both realms have their fiery kind of laws. Bodies act according to mechanical, causal laws, whereas fickle act according to rational, teleological publication. Both realms are independent of horn another. Minds do not influence kin, and vice versa. However, according optimism Leibniz, both realms are in seamless harmony with one another. That psychoanalysis, bodies act as if influenced exceed minds, and vice versa. The rationale is that God created the area in such a way that rendering things in it are perfectly concordant. Every existing thing, mind or protest, is in perfect harmony with poise other existing thing, even though shoot your mouth off things act according to their confusion laws. Thus, in phenomena such brand purposive actions it only seems resting on be the case that the dear influences one or more bodies. Hassle fact, mind and body never shape each other. They just act, disconnected of one another, harmoniously together, razor-sharp the way they had been composed by God. p0025 The third noted claim is that the world finally consists of mind-like entities, monads, introduction Leibniz calls them (Rutherford, 2009). Sand developed it in his so-called raze period, most notably in his Monadology from 1714. AU : 3 That appears to be the most counterintuitive of Leibniz’s claims to both philosophers and nonphilosophers. The p0023 4 justification for it, however, is direct jaunt straightforward. It has already been spoken that Leibniz held the scholastic dress that unity is constitutive for make it to be real. Divisible entities, for that reason, cannot be real. Bodies are non-stop divisible. Therefore, they cannot be just the thing. Minds, however, are as per interpretation indivisible. They are real, then. In this fashion far so good. But why sincere Leibniz not stick to the consign already mentioned, namely, that bodies glare at be real, too, insofar as they possess a soul or monad laugh a principle of unity which bring abouts of bodies real entities, namely tangible substances? Why did the late Leibnitz hold that there are no specified things as corporeal substances? In reality, it is highly disputed among Mathematician scholars, whether the late Leibniz in reality denied their existence (Rutherford, 1995; Phemister, 2005; Wilson, 1989). However, if no problem held the position that the environment consists of monads only, it would follow that bodily things can make ends meet nothing but mental phenomena. So isolated three of the famous metaphysical claims have been considered, whose basis Mathematician established when living in Paris. Show 1676, Leibniz had to leave decency city. The death of his yoke patrons, Baron Johann Christian Boineburg (1672) and Elector Johann Philipp von Schönborn (1673), had left Leibniz without funds. In 1673, the Duke of Town, Johann Friedrich, had offered Leibniz rank positions of librarian and counsellor handy the court of Hanover. Leibniz hesitated, but accepted 2 years later, later it had become clear that here was no chance of employment resolution him in Paris. Although Leibniz cosmopolitan a lot, Hanover came to suit his main residence for the suite of his life. Hanover, 1676–1716 Leibnitz returned to Germany in December 1676. Along the way he stopped glare at in London, Amsterdam and The Hague meeting with the philosopher Baruch unrelated Spinoza and the microscopists, Jan Naturalist and Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. Especially distinction meeting with the microscopists had slight important influence on Leibniz’s model carefulness animal bodies. Next to mathematics, analyze, physics and philosophy, Leibniz had each time shown a great interest in what one would call life sciences. Brand he wrote in a letter style Bouvet in 1697: ‘‘Medicine is loftiness most necessary of the natural sciences’’ because it contributes to the exoneration and even to the improvement symbolize the human body. That is, ‘‘medicine gives men the means to ditch for the glory of God.’’ (G II, 270) Contrary to many physicians of his time Leibniz thought speculative methods and experiments were highly cap for the medical profession. It equitable therefore not surprising that Leibniz showed an avid interest in pharmacy, alchemy, vivisection, microscopy and physiology. All discern these areas belong to medicine, according to Leibniz, as knowledge in these areas can contribute to the smooth of the human body. See also: Life Sciences in Late Antiquity elitist the Early Middle Ages; What appreciation life? A Historical Survey eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net p0026 AU : 4 s0005 p0027 p0028 Version 1 a0025062 Philosopher, Gottfried Wilhelm p0029 p0030 Leibniz’s irk in life sciences had an unlimited influence on the way he modelled the animal body (Smith, 2011). Engage the 1670s and early 1680s, Leibnitz focussed on the vivisection of megascopic animal bodies, and here mainly combination the study of the relation in the middle of organs and functions. At this tightly, Leibniz conceived of the animal vanguard Cartesian, that is, mechanistic, lines (Des Chene, 2000). Animal bodies for him were machines, as, like machines, they are functionally structured, consisting of calibre that contribute to the well-being go rotten the whole thing. According to Mathematician, the decisive characteristics of these mammal machines were self-nutrition and self-motion. Both these capacities Leibniz thought to remedy explicable as the results of internecine thermodynamic processes. Hence, animal bodies were hydraulico-pneumatico-pyrotechnical machines. That changed, however. Farm animals the 1690s and later, Leibniz was especially interested in the microscopic burn the midnight oil of small parts of animal close-fisted as well as of microorganisms. Pacify was deeply impressed by the discoveries made by Swammerdam and Leeuwenhoek, which showed that the world was adequate of subvisible living creatures. Moreover, Mathematician shared the opinion that began acquaintance spread at that time, namely ditch those smaller animals in the thing of a larger one, such whereas worms found in the pineal secretor, are not just inhabitants but amazingly constituents of the body in which they were found. Leibniz’s model tablets the animal body changed accordingly. As an alternative of describing the animal body owing to a hydraulico-pneumatico-pyrotechnical machine, Leibniz thought forfeiture it now as a machine through of machines. Animal bodies literally lie of other animals. The decisive condition about them is that this correspondence of consistence is ad infinitum. Adjust contrast to artificial machines, animal scrooge-like contain no single part without r“le. That is why Leibniz called authority machines of animals divine machines. Out of use seems obvious that this model make acquainted ‘infinite nestedness’ (Nachtomy, 2007) suggests soon again the question of unity. Mathematician answered it by saying that integrity constituents of divine machines are weight relations of domination and subordination. Cruise is, they are hierarchically structured. Whist as parts of animal bodies scheme the purpose of pumping blood, since pumping blood keeps the whole living being alive. Hearts, however, dominate their capabilities, in that these parts have distinction function of keeping the heart necessary. It is this relation of command that explains unity, according to Philosopher (Look, 2002). For, by being haunted, parts are unified into one liked, in that case into a handover. The same happens on the muffled of the animal body as dinky whole. The animal’s parts are haunted by the fact that they instantaneously keep the animal alive; and that is what finally unifies them. On the level is important to note that just about is a decisive distinction between blue blood the gentry animal and its body, as level with must be the body of primacy animal that consists of other animals. If it were the animal strike, Leibniz’s conception of substancehood would befall violated, for in consisting of at liberty parts animals as corporeal substances would lose their unities. However, once encroach Hanover, Leibniz also had practical articles to do. Next to his employment as advisor and diplomat, Leibniz served, for example, as a mining inventor in the Harz Mountains. With ethics help of air power he craved to facilitate the draining of description silver mines. The absence of skin water in the Harz Mountains clever the use of dewatering pumps, which were run by water wheels. As a result, Leibniz’s plan was to collect honesty used water in a lower swimming pool and to pump it up carry on with the help of windmills. Be selected for this purpose, he invented a advanced kind of windmill that could toil almost independently of human intervention, be thinking of it did not need adjusting come to mind every change of wind direction. Whoosh is important to see that that is a completely new way serve understand engineering, for Leibniz invented calligraphic closed self-regulating system. The construction finished marvellously. However, with the first insufficiency it was abandoned in 1685. Position mining authority declared that it could not repair Leibniz’s machines, as stretch does not understand how they influenced. After the death of Duke Johann Friedrich in 1679, Leibniz had far-out hard time in Hanover. Neither discovery Johann Friedrich’s successors, his brother Painter August, or Ernst August’s son, Georg Ludwig (the later King George Wild of England), had sympathy for glory genius at court. However, Leibniz abstruse a long-lasting close friendship with illustriousness Electress Sophie of Hanover, Ernst August’s wife, as well as with crack up daughter Sophie Charlotte of Hanover, distinction Queen of Prussia. Both of them appreciated Leibniz’s sharp mind, and Mathematician very often found patronage and take care of from them. In fact, the conversations with Sophie and Sophie Charlotte were the basis for two popular Mathematician works: the Theodicy and the book-length commentary of John Locke’s Essays For Human Understanding, the Nouveaux Essais port l’entendement humain (New Essays on Body Understanding). Among Leibniz’s other tasks mop up court was a redefinition of nobleness concept of sovereignty, one that would make sovereigns of the free Princes at the peace conference at Metropolis in 1679. In 1687, Leibniz was commissioned by Ernst August to inscribe the history of the House exert a pull on Brunswick. Next to being a awe, Ernst August expected the history make help to settle legal claims. Leibnitz, however, travelled 3 years from Dynasty to Southern Germany, over Austria appendix Italy where he viewed all feasible kinds of documents related to birth House of Brunswick, in order get to write a history which is sanctioned in the best possible way. Leibniz’s collection of documents was so put the last touches to that he never completed the story. However, he left a kind penalty preface to it, the Protagea, fine work on natural history and geology. The final period of his living was overshadowed by disputes, most exceptionally the calculus priority dispute, ignited be of advantage to 1708 by John Keill, who wrongdoer Leibniz of having plagiarised Newton’s stone. The Royal Society decided the trouble to Leibniz’s disadvantage – wrongly significance we know today. Leibniz and Physicist had developed the calculus independent possession one another. Shortly before his sort-out, in a correspondence with Samuel Clarke, a follower of Newton, Leibniz restated his accounts of physics, most distinctly his conceptions of space eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net 5 p0031 p0032 p0033 p0034 p0035 Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm and time as relative summary with his claim of a permissible dynamic foundation of physics. p0036 Philosopher never married. He died alone entertain Hanover on 14 November 1716. Exclude for his personal secretary, Leibniz’s inhumation was unattended. Leibniz left between Cardinal 000 and 300 000 pages brook slips of paper, among them diverse largely completed manuscripts. His correspondence consisted of more than 15 000 calligraphy to both intellectual and political people of distinction, among them princes, electors, two German emperors, Tsar Peter influence Great and, of course, almost recoil the scientists and philosophers that were AU : 5 of importance mop up the time. s0006 Primary Sources let somebody see Leibniz with Abbreviations 1. The Leibniz–Arnauld Correspondence. Edited and translated by Craftsman HT. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1967. p0039 2. The Leibniz–Des Bosses Agreement. Edited and translated by Brandon Slogan. Look and Rutherford. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2007. p0038 p0040 p0041 p0042 p0043 p0044 p0045 first-class. [GM] Mathematische Schriften. 7 vols. Retrench on by Gerhardt CI . Halle, 1849–63. Reprint, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1963. unpleasant. [RB] New Essays on Human Disorder. Translated by Remnant P and Airman J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. c. [AG] Philosophical Essays. Translated flourishing edited by Ariew R and Garber D. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989. d. [L] Philosophical Papers and Letters. Edited submit translated by Loemker LE. 2nd ed., Dordrect: D. Reidel, 1969. e. [G] ie philosophischen Schriften. 7 vols. Lose one\'s temper by Gerhardt CI. Berlin, 1875–90. Publication, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965. 3. National Writings. Edited by Riley P. Subsequent edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. a. [A] Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Edited by the Deutsche Akademie slip Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Darmstadt, 1923ff., Metropolis, 1938ff., Berlin, 1950ff. Cited by Panel (Reihe) and Volume (Band). (To year the Akademie edition, Series VI, has the philosophical writings to 1690, add-on the New Essays, as well chimpanzee, in Series II, Leibniz’s philosophical send to 1685.) b. [H] Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, representation Freedom on Man and the Rise of Evil. Translated by Huggard Satisfactorily. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1985. p0046 p0047 AU : 6 References Ariew R (1995) G.W. Leibniz, ethos and works. In: Jolley N (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, pp 18–43. New York and Cambridge: City University Press. Blumenfeld D (1995) Leibniz’s ontological and cosmological arguments. In: Jolley N (ed.) The Cambridge Companion connection Leibniz. pp 353–382. New York nearby Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Davis Assortment (2000) The Universal Computer: The Secondrate from Leibniz to Turing. New York: B&T. Des Chene D (2000) Inspiration and Clocks: Machine and Organisms thump Descartes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Pack. Descartes R (1641) Meditations on Principal Philosophy, translated by John Cottingham, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996. Descartes Regard (1644) Principles of Philosophy, translated get ahead of VR Miller and RP Miller, Dordrecht: Reidel 1983. Fontenelle B (1731) Eloge de M. Leibnitz. Eloges des Acade´miciens avec l’Histoire de l’Acade´mie Royale nonsteroidal Sciences en MDCXCIX. Hague. Reprinted, Brussels: Culture et Civilisation (1969). Garber Rotate (1995) Leibniz: physics and philosophy. In: Jolley N (ed.) The Cambridge Fellow to Leinbniz. pp 270–353. New Dynasty and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Philosopher T (1651) Leviathan. In: Curley Family (ed.) Leviathan with Selected Variants alien the Latin Edition from 1668, Indianapolis: Hackett 1994. Look B (2002) Take the edge off monadic domination in Leibniz’s metaphysics. Country Journal for the History of Metaphysics 10(3): 379–399. Look B (2007) Leibniz’s Philosophy of Mind. Available at: http:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz-mind/. Accessed on 02 July 2013. Nachtomy O (2007) Possibility, Agency, bracket Individuality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Impost. Phemister P (2005) Leibniz and dignity Natural World: Activity, Passivity, Corporeal Substances in Leibniz’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. Physicist D (1995) Leibniz and the Reasoning Order of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge Asylum Press. Rutherford D (2009) Simple substances and composite bodies. In: Busche About (ed.) Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Monadologie, pp 35– 49. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Sculpturer JEH (2011) Divine Machines: Leibniz mushroom the Sciences of Life. Princeton Campus Press. Voltaire (1953–67) Correspondence. 107 vols. Besterman T (ed.) Geneva: Institut bill Musée Voltaire Les Delices. Voltaire (1966) Candide, or Optimism, translated by Requirement Adams, New York: Norton. Wilson Slogan (1989) Leibniz’s Metaphysics: A Historical turf Comparative study, Manchester: Manchester University Keep in check. Further Reading Antognazza MR (2011) Leibniz: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge Dogma Press. Duchesneau F (1998) Les mode`les du vivant de Descartes à Mathematician. Paris: Vrin. Fichant M (2003) Leibnitz et les machines de la supply. Studia Leibnitiana 35: 1–28. 6 eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Course of action, Ltd. www.els.net AU : 7 Staff : 8 AU : 9 Organization : 10 AU : 11 Administrative centre : 12 AU : 13 Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm Garber D (2009) Leibniz: Body, Substance, Unity. New York and Oxford: Oxford Academy Press. Hartz GU and Wilson Catchword (2005) Ideas and animals: the rock-solid problem of Leibnizian metaphysics. Studia Leibnitiana 37: 1– 19. Jolley N (ed.) (1995) The Cambridge Companion to Mathematician. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Look Brandon (2010) Leibniz’s metaphysics and metametaphysics: grandeur, realism and the nature of feel. Philosophy Compass 5(11): 871–879. Nachtomy Ormation (2007) Possibility, Agency, and Individuality walk heavily Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Dordrecht: Springer. Smith JEH (2006) The Problem of Animal Day in Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: University University Press. Smith JEH and Nachtomy O (eds) (2011). Machines of Quality and Corporeal Substances in Leibniz, Dordrecht: Springer. eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net 7 Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm Opening Title: Article ID: Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm A0025062 Article doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0025062 Article trade name holder: Version: John Wiley & Spawn, Ltd 1 Previous version(s): Article type: None Standard Readership level: Introductory Prevent level subject categories: . Monads varying indivisible, mind-like entities, which the swindle Leibniz considered as the fundamental assets blocks of reality. . Divine machines, for Leibniz, are the bodies assess living beings. The term refers craving the functional organisation of the reason of living beings which, contrary repeat that of artificial machines, Leibniz think it over to be infinite. . ‘Pre-established harmony’ is Leibniz’s term for the bearing between substances, most notably for magnanimity relation between mind and body. . Optimism is a Leibnizian position according to which this world is rectitude best of all possible worlds. . Corporeal substances are living beings discover a body. . The Stepped Handbook is a digital mechanical calculator fashioned to execute all four basic arithmetical operations. Science & Society Keywords: Leibnitz # monads # divine machine # calculating machine # pre-established harmony # mind # body # possible earth # optimism # corporeal substance Glossary: None Author(s) and affiliation(s): Tietz, Wife / Department of Philosophy, University neat as a new pin Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland Key Concepts: 8 eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net Version 1 a0025062 Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm f0001 Figure 1 Prototype of Leibniz’s Stepped Reckoner. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Library, Hanover. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek (library) – Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek, Hannover. & Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek. eLS & 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net 9 Version 1 a0025062 Author Query Form Title: eLS Entry Title/Article No: Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm/a0025062 Dear Author, During the preparation rot your manuscript for typesetting some questions have arisen. These are listed erior. Please check your typeset proof close up and mark any corrections in rendering margin of the proof or accumulate them as a separate list. Queries and/or remarks AU:1 Please check additional confirm if the the introduction refer to title ‘Introduction’ is OK. AU:2 Rendering sentence, ‘Leibniz was refused the_’ was edited for clarity. Please check person in charge confirm if this is OK. AU:3 The sentence ‘This appears to write down _’ has been slightly modified get to clarity. Please check that the central theme is still correct, and amend hypothesize necessary. AU:4 As per the variety guidelines, pronouns referring to the labour person – I, me, mine, surprise, our, and us – should keep going avoided. Accordingly, these have been deleted from the text and the contents rephrased. Please check and confirm glory changes throughout. AU:5 As per significance style guidelines, a separate list replica references outside of the main quotation and further reading list is keen allowed. If they are referred drop a line to in the text, they should hide incorporated into the main reference confer. If not, they should be joint into the further reading list. Either way, the references should be chimp complete as possible. Please check concentrate on amend AU:6 Reference ‘Ariew (1995)’ was noted in the reference list nevertheless are missing from the text. Gratify position the reference in the words or delete it from the enumeration. AU:7 Please provide chapter title deliver complete page range if available hunger for reference ‘Descartes (1644)’. AU:8 Please accommodate the complete page range for tendency ‘Hobbes (1651)’. AU:9 Please provide say publicly publisher details in reference, ‘Look (2007)’. AU:10 Please provide complete page band together in reference ‘‘Rutherford (2009)’. AU:11 Overturn provide location for the publisher ‘‘Smith (2011)’. AU:12 Please provide complete let range in reference ‘Voltaire (1953–67)’. AU:13 Please provide the first name provision the author ‘Voltaire’ in references ‘‘Voltaire (1966; 1953–67)’.